Tuesday, September 23, 2008; Page A21
"The queen had only one way of settling all
difficulties, great or small. 'Off with his head!' she said
without even looking around."
-- "Alice's Adventures in
Wonderland"
Under the pressure of the financial crisis, one
presidential candidate is behaving like a flustered rookie playing
in a league too high. It is not Barack Obama.
Channeling his inner Queen of Hearts, John McCain furiously, and apparently without even
looking around at facts, said Chris Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, should be
decapitated. This childish reflex provoked the Wall Street Journal to editorialize that
"McCain untethered" -- disconnected from knowledge and
principle -- had made a "false and deeply unfair"
attack on Cox that was "unpresidential" and
demonstrated that McCain "doesn't understand what's
happening on Wall Street any better than Barack Obama
does."
To read the Journal's details about the depths
of McCain's shallowness on the subject of Cox's
chairmanship, see "McCain's Scapegoat" (Sept. 19,
Page A22). Then consider McCain's characteristic accusation
that Cox "has betrayed the public's trust."
Perhaps an old antagonism is involved in
McCain's fact-free slander. His most conspicuous economic
adviser is Douglas Holtz-Eakin, who previously headed the
Congressional Budget Office. There he was an
impediment to conservatives, including then-Rep. Cox, who, as
chairman of the Republican Policy Committee, persistently tried
and generally failed to enlist CBO support for "dynamic
scoring" that would estimate the economic growth effects of
proposed tax cuts.
In any case, McCain's smear -- that Cox "betrayed the
public's trust" -- is a harbinger of a McCain presidency.
For McCain, politics is always operatic, pitting people who agree
with him against those who are "corrupt" or "betray
the public's trust," two categories that seem to be
exhaustive -- there are no other people. McCain's Manichaean
worldview drove him to his signature legislative achievement, the
McCain-Feingold law's restrictions on campaigning. Today, his
campaign is creatively finding interstices in laws intended to
restrict campaign giving and spending. (For details, see The Post
of Sept. 17, Page A4; and the New York Times of
Sept. 20, Page One.)
By a Gresham's Law of political discourse, McCain's Queen
of Hearts intervention in the opaque financial crisis overshadowed
a solid conservative complaint from the Republican Study Committee,
chaired by Rep. Jeb Hensarling of Texas. In a letter to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman
Ben Bernanke, the RSC decried the improvised
torrent of bailouts as a "dangerous and unmistakable
precedent for the federal government both to be looked to and
indeed relied upon to save private sector companies from the
consequences of their poor economic decisions." This
letter, listing just $650 billion of the perhaps more than $1
trillion in new federal exposures to risk, was sent while
McCain's campaign, characteristically substituting vehemence
for coherence, was airing an ad warning that Obama favors
"massive government, billions in spending
increases."
The political left always aims to expand the
permeation of economic life by politics. Today, the efficient means
to that end is government control of capital. So, is not
McCain's party now conducting the most leftist administration
in American history? The New Deal never acted so precipitously on
such a scale. Treasury Secretary Paulson, asked about conservative
complaints that his rescue program amounts to socialism, said,
essentially: This is not socialism, this is necessary. That non
sequitur might be politically necessary, but remember that
government control of capital is government control of capitalism.
Does McCain have qualms about this, or only quarrels?
On "60 Minutes" Sunday evening, McCain, saying
"this may sound a little unusual," said that he would
like to replace Cox with Andrew Cuomo, the Democratic attorney general of
New York who is the son of former governor Mario Cuomo. McCain explained that Cuomo has
"respect" and "prestige" and could
"lend some bipartisanship." Conservatives have been
warned.
Conservatives who insist that electing McCain is
crucial usually start, and increasingly end, by saying he would
make excellent judicial selections. But the more one sees of his
impulsive, intensely personal reactions to people and events, the
less confidence one has that he would select judges by calm
reflection and clear principles, having neither patience nor
aptitude for either.
It is arguable that, because of his inexperience,
Obama is not ready for the presidency. It is arguable that McCain,
because of his boiling moralism and bottomless reservoir of
certitudes, is not suited to the presidency. Unreadiness can be
corrected, although perhaps at great cost, by experience. Can a
dismaying temperament be fixed?
georgewill@washpost.com